Judges

The selection process for the awards involves an impartial panel of industry experts who generously volunteer their time to evaluate submissions. These individuals are chosen for their expertise and experience.

Judges review entries, ensuring a fair and unbiased evaluation. In cases where judges have conflicts of interest within specific categories, they abstain from participating in the assessment of those particular entries.

Upon the submission deadline, judges receive all entries in a uniform format, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations. Each entry is then scored by the judges based on the defined criteria for each category.

Judges meet to discuss their assessments and collectively reach a final decision on a single day, solely based on the content provided in the written entries.

It is crucial to note that the entire judging process is conducted confidentially, and all decisions reached during this process are considered final.

Alice Marren

L and D Partner - Arco Ltd

Alice has worked in Learning and Development for just over 12 years now, joining Arco Ltd nearly 9 years ago. Alice is quite new to managing the apprenticeship scheme at Arco but has relished the chance to take this on as part of her role, and the opportunities this has presented her with (like presenting here tonight!). She has a real passion for people and their development, taking great pride and pleasure from supporting people to achieve their ambitions.

#EYApprentice24

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Get the latest updates on events in and around your area. Be the first to know what we have planned around you!

quick links
legal
National World Publishing Ltd ©2024
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram